Orissa High Court
WP(C)/5463/2017 of NIMAIN CH.ROUT Vs STATE OF ORISSA on 25 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 5463 of 2017 CNR No. ODHC010203672026 Nimain Ch. Routray & Ors. ..... Petitioners Mr. L.K. Tripathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA Mr. B. Dash, Advocate (Opp. Party Nos. 2 to 4)
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 5463 of 2017
CNR No. ODHC010203672026
Nimain Ch. Routray & Ors.
.....
Petitioners
Mr. L.K. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA
Mr. B. Dash, Advocate
(Opp. Party Nos. 2 to 4)
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.08.2026 Order No. 15
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioners, therefore, most humbly pray that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to issue a Rule Nisi calling upon the Opp. parties to show cause as to why they should not be directed to allow/release the scale of pay Rs.9300-34,800/- plus grade pay Rs.4200/- of Head Clerk to the petitioners from the dates of promotion as Head Clerk as indicated in the chart at Annexure-1with all consequential benefits and arrear.
And if the Opp. parties fail to show cause or sufficient cause, the rule be made absolute; And issue any other order/direction which would afford complete relief to the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the case;
Page 2 of 2. And for this act of kindness, the petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that though highlighting their grievances, Petitioners have filed a representation at Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 4, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 4 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 4 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioners.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 28-Aug-2026 11:49:37 Signature Not Verified