Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/8360/2026 of BATA KRUSHNA BAL Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8360 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010518592026 Bata Krushna Bal …. Petitioner Mr. B. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 25.08.2026 02. 1. Heard

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 8360 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010518592026

Bata Krushna Bal

….

Petitioner

Mr. B. Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.08.2026

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.1241 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Chandikhol, arising out of Badachana P.S. Case No.237 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 109(1)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 126(2)/ 296/ 3(5)/ 351(2)/ 74 of BNS.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that even if the entire prosecution allegation is accepted at its face value, the overt act is attributed to one Sunil Behera and Sridhar Behera and at best the allegation under Section 74 BNS can be levelled so far as the Petitioner is concerned.

4. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the said Sunil Behera has since been released on pre-arrest bail in terms of the order dated 06.08.2026 in ABLAPL No.9008. Hence, the Petitioner may be protected by pre-arrest bail since he is on better footing.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during currency of investigation.

6. Taking into account the nature of allegation qua the Petitioner, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature.

7. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.

8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

10. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Santoshi

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 27-Aug-2026 12:00:07 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead