Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25333/2026 of PRADEEPTA KUMAR MANGARAJ Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25333 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010518112026 Pradeepta Kumar Mangaraj …. Petitioner Mr. K.P Mishra, Sr.Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.P Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 25.08.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.25333 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010518112026

Pradeepta Kumar

Mangaraj

….

Petitioner

Mr. K.P Mishra,

Sr.Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and

Others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. S.P Das, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.08.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

(i) direct/ order the Opp. Party No.2 to treat the Petitioner as 1991 recruit, for the purpose of his retirement benefits, by granting notional benefits, with effect from 1991 for the interest of justice;

(ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice;

// 2 //

And for which act of kindness, the Petitioner as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-7 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge Nitu Prava Digitally Signed Signed by: NITU PRAVA PRUSTY Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 27-Aug-2026 18:18:52 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead