Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/7738/2026 of DIBYAJYOTI MISHRA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7738 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010448842026 Dibyajyoti Mishra … Petitioner Mr. A . K. Mishra, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. The Commissioner of CT & GST (State GST) …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. K. Lenka, ASC Mr. A . Kedia,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.7738 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010448842026

Dibyajyoti Mishra

…

Petitioner

Mr. A. K. Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

1. State of Odisha

2. The Commissioner

of CT & GST (State

GST)

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. S. K. Lenka, ASC

Mr. A. Kedia, Advocate

(for O.P. No.2)

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

21.08.2026

03.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. It is submitted that the Petitioner, who is working as a priest in a temple at Rourkela, has been falsely implicated for violation of provisions of GST Act. He has received summons. Therefore, he apprehends arrest and, hence, may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

3. Mr. Kedia, learned Junior Standing Counsel, Central GST and Central Excise, on instruction, submits that in the case at hand assessment has been made raising a demand of Rs.33,05,562/- on account of Financial Year 2018-19.

It is further submitted by the learned Junior Standing Counsel, Central GST and Central Excise, on instruction, that the apprehension of the Petitioner being taken into custody is misconceived.

4. On considering the rival submissions, this Court does not find force in the submissions made by the learned for the Petitioner that there is even any perceptible threat of arrest.

5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

6. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to renew his prayer if there is any fresh cause of action.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Aug-2026 18:53:21 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead