Orissa High Court

WP(C)/26087/2026 of BASANTI SAHU Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26087 of 2026 [CNR No.- ODHC010519442026] Basanti Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. Abhilash Mishra, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Additional Chief Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Khurda 3. Collector, Subarnapur 4. Tahasildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.26087 of 2026

[CNR No.- ODHC010519442026]

Basanti Sahu

….

Petitioner

Mr. Abhilash Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

1. State of Odisha

2. Additional Chief Secretary, Housing

and Urban Development, Khurda

3. Collector, Subarnapur

4. Tahasildar, Sonepur

5. Executive Officer, Subarnapur

Municipality, Subarnapur

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Bibekananda Nayak,

Additional Government Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

02. 21.08.2026

(Through hybrid Mode)

1. This writ application has been filed for a direction to the Opposite Parties to provide a house to the Petitioner under the scheme of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana of the Central Government (in short “PMAY”).

2. Mr. A. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that although the Petitioner who is a widow, has submitted her application more than three years ago i.e. on 26.04.2023, before the Executive Officer, Subarnapur Municipality along with supporting documents, but the same has not been considered. Applications of other persons who had applied at that time have been allowed.

3. He further submits that since no decision has been taken on her earlier application, as it was filed two and half years ago, the Petitioner shall file another application along with supporting documents before the Executive Officer, Subarnapur Municipality within a period of two weeks for grant of benefit under the PMAY and a direction may be issued for its consideration.

4. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the nature of order, I propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the Opposite Parties or hear them.

5. Without going into the merit of the case of the Petitioner for grant of benefit under the PMAY, the writ application is disposed of directing the Opposite Party No.5 to consider the application of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six weeks, if it is filed within a period of two weeks from today.

6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho) Judge Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 21-Aug-2026 19:42:24 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead