Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/9643/2026 of SANJAY KUMAR PANIGRAHI @ SANJAY PANIGRAHI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 21 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9643 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010587932026 1. Sanjay Kumar Panigrahi @ Sanjay Panigrahi 2. Rama Chandra Panigrahi 3. Majulata Panigrahi 4. Ranjan Panigrahi 5. Pratima Panigrahi 6. Dibya Ranjan Panigrahi …. Petitioners Mr. D. Nanda, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.9643 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010587932026
1. Sanjay Kumar
Panigrahi @ Sanjay
Panigrahi
2. Rama Chandra
Panigrahi
3. Majulata Panigrahi
4. Ranjan Panigrahi
5. Pratima Panigrahi
6. Dibya Ranjan
Panigrahi
….
Petitioners
Mr. D. Nanda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.08.2026
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.783 of 2026 pending on the file of learned JMFC, Aul Kendrapara, arising out of Rajkanika P.S. Case No.495 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 85 of the BNSS and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.
3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.
4. Taking into account the nature of allegations relating to the informant entering into matrimony in the case at hand notwithstanding subsistence marriage and the litigation inter se, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent.
5. If it comes to fore that the Petitioners have any criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.
6. It is further stated that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Soumya Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Aug-2026 18:41:58 Signature Not Verified