Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26308/2026 of SURENDRA NATH MOHANTA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 21 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 26308 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010628282026 Surendra Nath Mohanta ..... Petitioner Mr. T.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S. P Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 26308 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010628282026
Surendra Nath Mohanta
.....
Petitioner
Mr. T.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. S. P Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.08.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore prays that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to consider the case of the petitioner for allowing pension and pensionary benefits by counting his past service rendered under J.C. estt. and Regular Estt. in the light of the benefit given to similarly situated employees under the All- Orissa Settlement and Consolidation Non- Gazetted Technical Officers Association, Dhenkanal vide Govt. order dated 04.08.2023; And pass such other orders/directions as may be deemed fit and proper.
Page 2 of 2. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Nitu Prava Digitally Signed Signed by: NITU PRAVA PRUSTY Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 24-Aug-2026 17:22:44 Signature Not Verified