Orissa High Court
CONTC/5029/2026 of JIKURUN NESSAN Vs DR.N THIRUMALA NAIK, IAS on 21 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5029 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010498152026 Jikurun Nessan ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Subhadutta Routray -versus- Dr.N Thirumala Naik, IAS and ors. ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. P. K. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: MR.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.5029 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010498152026
Jikurun Nessan
.....
Petitioner
Represented by Adv. -
Subhadutta Routray
-versus-
Dr.N Thirumala Naik, IAS and ors.
.....
Opposite
Parties
Represented
by Adv. –
Mr. P. K.
Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.08.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Alleging willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order dated 10.02.2022 passed in W.P.(OAC) No.3827 of 2014, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present CONTC application.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, contended that the order dated 10.02.2022 has already been confirmed by the Appellate Division Bench in Writ Appeal bearing W.A. No.487 of 2024 along with a batch of similar other writ appeals, disposed of vide a common order dated 23.02.2026. It is further contended that despite the said order having been confirmed by the
Page 2 of 2. Appellate Division Bench, the opposite parties have not taken any step for implementation of the said order.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party- contemnors, on the other hand, contended that if some more time is granted to the opposite party-contemnors, necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that the order passed by this Court is implemented.
5. Considering such submissions, this CONTC application is disposed of by granting further six weeks’ time to the opposite party-contemnors to ensure that the order dated 10.02.2022 passed in W.P.(OAC) No.3827 of 2014 is implemented, failing which, the Opposite party-contemnors shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against them for willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the CONTC application is disposed of.
(ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA) Judge Utkalika
Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 25-Aug-2026 11:28:52 Signature Not Verified