Orissa High Court

WP(C)/26182/2026 of RANJAN KUMAR PRADHAN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26182 of 2026 (CNR No.ODHC010623792026) Ranjan Kumar Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr. C.K. Sahoo, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.26182 of 2026

(CNR No.ODHC010623792026)

Ranjan Kumar Pradhan

….

Petitioner

Mr. C.K. Sahoo, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. S.P. Das, ASC

COROM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

20.08.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the abovementioned facts and circumstances of the case, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs by directing the Opp. Parties to regularize the service of the petitioner in the post of TB Health Visitor w.e.f. the date of completion of 6 years of service on contractual basis. And further be pleased to direct the petitioner to give all consequential service and financial benefits to the petitioners. Or pass ass such order(s) /direction(s) as case may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.

// 2 //

And for which act of kindness, the petitioner, the Petition as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a detailed representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of two weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid time period.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge

Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 21-Aug-2026 11:05:52 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead