Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25729/2026 of NABAHARI JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 25729 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010579112026 Nabahari Jena ..... Petitioner Mr. P.K. Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 25729 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010579112026
Nabahari Jena
.....
Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
20.08.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Therefore, under the above facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hob'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application, issue rule NISI calling upon the opp.parties to show cause and after hearing the parties be pleased to directing the opp.party No.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner for appointment of Home Guard for the trade of painter in the District of Balasore district Home Guard Organisation, who have been applied as per the office order of the opp.party No.3 had published in the year 2025 within the stipulated period in the interest of justice;
Page 2 of 2.
And may further be pleased to pass such other/ further writ/ writs direction/ directions, order/orders as deem fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of this case for the interest of justice and equity; And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-3 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-3 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 21-Aug-2026 11:05:51 Signature Not Verified