Orissa High Court
CMP/218/2017 of JAWAHARLAL PANI Vs BRAJA KISHORE PANI on 20 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 218 of 2017 CNR No. - ODHC010257192017 Jawaharlal Pani …. Petitioner None -versus- 1.Braja Kishore Pani 2.Motilal Pani 3.Subash Chandra Pani 4.Rajalaxmi Devi 5.Saraswati Devi 6.Nabakishore Pani 7.Chandra Sekhar Pani 8. Pravasini Pani 9.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 218 of 2017
CNR No. - ODHC010257192017
Jawaharlal Pani
….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
1.Braja Kishore Pani
2.Motilal Pani
3.Subash Chandra Pani
4.Rajalaxmi Devi
5.Saraswati Devi
6.Nabakishore Pani
7.Chandra Sekhar Pani
8. Pravasini Pani
9. Tani @ Swarnaprava Pani
10. Swetalina Pani
….
Opp. Parties
None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
06. 20.08.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 13.02.2017 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Puri in Title Suit No. 412 of 1997 (Annexure-1), rejecting the petition dated 05.01.2017 of the plaintiff to consolidate Civil Suit No. 412 of 1997 with Civil Suit No. 140 of 2003.
2. While issuing notice on 27.03.2017, further proceedings in the suit had been stayed by this Court.
3. On 13.10.2017, Petitioner had been directed to take fresh notice on Opposite Party Nos.1 to 5 and 7 to 10 by speed post with AD along with corrected address.
4. Registry has pointed out that requisites have not been filed and in the meanwhile Opposite Party No. 2 and 3 have entered appearance.
5. Memo has been filed 11.11.2021 by Mr. V. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Petitioner stating that the Petitioner wants to withdraw the CMP.
6. None appears for the Petitioner, the Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 or the Opposite Party No.6 when the matter is called.
7. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the CMP is dismissed as withdrawn.
8. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
9. Misc. Case No. 248 of 2017 stands disposed of.
10. Copy of this order be communicated to the learned trial Court by the Registry.
11. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhalaxmi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 20-Aug-2026 19:26:03 Signature Not Verified