Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9611/2026 of KOTESWAR DASH @ RINKU Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9611 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010628262026 1. Koteswar Dash @ Rinku 2. Prasanna Dalabehera @ Nalu …. Petitioners Mr. D. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9611 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010628262026

1. Koteswar Dash @

Rinku

2. Prasanna

Dalabehera @ Nalu

….

Petitioners

Mr. D. Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

20.08.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.1535 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C- V, Bhubaneswar, arising out of Khandagiri P.S. Case No. 593 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 115(2), 118(1), 296, 303(2), 332(c), 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioners are similarly circumstanced with the co- accused, who are enlarged on pre-arrest bail by order dated 07.08.2026 by this Court in ABLAPL No.9081 of 2026. Hence, on the ground of parity, they seek release.

4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer in view of the criminal antecedent of the Petitioners mentioned in the petition.

5. Considering the nature of allegation and criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for pre-arrest bail. However, it is directed that the Petitioners may surrender before the learned J.M.F.C- V, Bhubaneswar in connection with the aforementioned case within one month from today.

In the event of their surrender and motion for bail, the same be considered by the learned J.M.F.C-V, Bhubaneswar on merits, in the first hour of the day.

In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned J.M.F.C- V, Bhubaneswar, the Petitioners are at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day.

6. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioners on the same day on merit in accordance with law. `

The case diary shall be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioners and learned J.M.F.C- V, Bhubaneswar is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum at the earliest in the event of rejection of such bail application.

Ground of Parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court (s) below.

7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Soumya Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Aug-2026 17:43:02 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead