Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25877/2026 of SUMANTA KUMAR NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 25877 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010608832026 Sumanta Kumar Nayak ..... Petitioner Mr. M. Pati, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 25877 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010608832026
Sumanta Kumar Nayak
.....
Petitioner
Mr. M. Pati, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
20.08.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore prays that your lordships may graciously be pleased to allow this writ application by directing the Opp. parties to modify the order dtd. 13.05.2025 under Annexure-8 thereby declaring the same as illegal and erroneous one with further directing the Opp. party no.3 & 4 for proper fixation of pay & pension of the petitioner on the basis of G.P of Rs. 5400/- in the corresponding scale of pay as per the pay matrix available under 1st schedule of ORSP Rules 2017 w.e.f 01.01.2016 with further sanctioning & disbursing the consequential arrear financial benefits as due & admissible in favour of the
Page 2 of 2. petitioner within a time bound period for the interest of justice. And pass such order/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-10 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-10 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 21-Aug-2026 11:05:52 Signature Not Verified