Orissa High Court

CONTC/5904/2025 of BISWAJIT MOHANTA Vs PURNA CHANDRA SETHI, DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MAYURBHANJ on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5904 of 2025 CNR No.ODHC010872042025 Biswajit Mohanta …. Petitioner Mr. Ranjit Samal, Advocate -versus- Purna Chandra Sethi, District Education Officer, Mayurbhanj …. Opposite Party/ Contemnor Mr. Surya Kanta Parhi, Addl. Standing

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.5904 of 2025

CNR No.ODHC010872042025

Biswajit Mohanta

….

Petitioner

Mr. Ranjit Samal, Advocate

-versus-

Purna Chandra Sethi, District

Education Officer, Mayurbhanj

…. Opposite Party/

Contemnor

Mr. Surya Kanta Parhi, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.

05.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

20.08.2026

1. Non-compliance of order dated 27th October, 2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.27852 of 2022 read with order dated 17th April, 2023 passed in CONTC No.2049 of 2023 has been alleged in this contempt petition.

2. When the matter is taken up today, a copy of the order dated 17th August, 2026 passed by the District Education Officer, Mayurbhanj has been furnished to this Court by the learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Opposite Party/Contemnor and submitted that the order/direction of this Court has already been complied with.

3. Mr. Ranjit Samal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is supplied with copy of the said order. Upon perusal of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to challenge the said order rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

4. Faced with such situation, as this Court finds no deliberate negligence or laches in complying with the orders of this Court, the contempt proceeding stands dropped and the contempt petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner, if he so advised, is at liberty to approach the appropriate authority/forum/Court in accordance with law.

(M.S. Raman)

Judge

MRS Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 20-Aug-2026 17:42:40 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead