Orissa High Court
CMP/1292/2016 of SUSHIL KU.SENAPATI Vs JYOSTNA RANI SAHOO on 20 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1292 of 2016 CNR No. ODHC010018622016 Sushil Kumar Senapati …. Petitioner None -versus- 1. Jyostna Rani Sahoo 2. Rabindra Kumar Sahoo 3. Prakash Chandra Panigrahi …. Opp. Parties Mr. K.M.H. Niamati, Advocate (For O.P. No.1) Mr. S.K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No.1292 of 2016
CNR No. ODHC010018622016
Sushil Kumar Senapati
….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
1. Jyostna Rani Sahoo
2. Rabindra Kumar Sahoo
3. Prakash Chandra Panigrahi
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. K.M.H. Niamati, Advocate
(For O.P. No.1)
Mr. S.K. Purohit, Advocate
(For O.P. No.2)
None (O.P. No.3)
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
18. 20.08.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 30.07.2016 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Rourkela in FAO No. 15 of 2015 dismissing the appeal filed by the Petitioner/defendant no.2 challenging the order dated 11.05.2015 passed in CMA No. 112/2011 arising out of C.S. No. 177/2011 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rourkela allowing the application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 CPC for temporary injunction filed by the Plaintiff/Opposite Party No.1, thereby restraining the Petitioner/defendant no.2
amongst others from blocking or obstructing, interfering in the suit passage in any manner till disposal of the suit.
2. Although notice has been issued in this case, but no interim order had been passed by this Court. In the meanwhile, almost 10 years have elapsed.
3. On 19.08.2026, Mr. K.M.H. Niamati, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.1 had sought for time to obtain instructions.
4. Today he submits that C.S. No. 177/2011 has been disposed of on 19.02.2020.
5. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.1 that the suit has been disposed of, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CMP pending.
6. The CMP is accordingly dismissed.
7. Misc. Case No. 1324 of 2016 stands disposed of.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge puspa Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 20-Aug-2026 19:02:49 Signature Not Verified