Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9584/2026 of GOBINDA TAKARI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9584 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010611542026 Gobinda Takari …. Petitioner Mr. A.R. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 20.08.2026 01. 1. Heard learned

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9584 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010611542026

Gobinda Takari

….

Petitioner

Mr. A.R. Panda, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

20.08.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.451 of 2026 pending on the file of learned SDJM, Koraput arising out of Koraput Town P.S. Case No.141 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 329(3), 296, 115(2), 109(1), 117(2), 118(2), 324(5), 351(3), 329(4), 333, 74, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the allegation under Section 109 of BNS has been made in an exaggerated manner and the same has to be viewed in the light of the civil dispute inter se between the parties.

4. It is further submitted by the learned counsel that the co-accused has since been released on bail by order dated 24.07.2026 by this Court in ABLAPL No.8320 of 2026. Since the Petitioner is at all fours with the co-accused, he may be protected by pre- arrest bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes such prayer.

6. On instruction it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the injured has suffered simple injuries.

7. Considering such submission and the background in which the allegations have been made, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of nature of the injury.

8. If it comes to the fore that the injured has suffered any grievous injury, this order shall not be given effect to.

9. It is further stated that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

10. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Soumya Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Aug-2026 17:43:01 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead