Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26159/2026 of MANAGING COMMITTEE OF BANKA SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., GANJAM Vs REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR-1 on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26159 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010621872026 Managing Committee of Banka Service Cooperative Society Ltd., Ganjam …. Petitioner Mr. B. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- Registrar Cooperative Societies, Odisha, Bhubaneswar-1 & Ors. …. Opposite Parties
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26159 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010621872026
Managing Committee of
Banka Service
Cooperative Society Ltd.,
Ganjam
….
Petitioner
Mr. B. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Registrar Cooperative
Societies, Odisha,
Bhubaneswar-1 & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd.30.06.2026 and 10.07.2026 so issued by Opposite Party No.2, but it is fairly contended that challenging both the orders, Petitioner’s society has already approached the Registrar of Cooperative Society, Odisha-Opposite Party No.1 in Revision Case No.27 of 2026.
// 2 //
4. However, it is contended that even though urgency is involved but Opposite Party No.1 is not taking up of the issue and thereby the Petitioner’s society is suffering and facing the wrath of Opposite Party No.2.
4.1. It is accordingly contended that Opposite Party No.1 be directed to take up the revision case and pass an appropriate order in the interim application so filed along with the revision.
5. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State has no serious objection to the course of action proposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner.
6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opposite Party No.1 to take up the Revision Case No.27/2026 and pass an appropriate order on the interim prayer in accordance with law on or before 28.08.2026.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 20-Aug-2026 17:54:45 Signature Not Verified