Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25907/2026 of HRUSHIKESH BALIARSINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25907 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010599192026 Hrushikesh Baliarsingh …. Petitioner Mr. L. P. Dwivedy, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25907 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010599192026
Hrushikesh Baliarsingh
….
Petitioner
Mr. L. P. Dwivedy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(i) quash the punishment Order of one Black Mark, dated 15.03.2021 as at Annexure-4, passed by the Opp.Party No.4, by concurrently holding the same is bad, illegal and is not maintainable and/or sustainable in the eye of law;
(ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s), as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice; And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”.
// 2 //
4. It is contended that against the order of punishment so imposed under Annexure-4, Petitioner though has preferred an appeal before Opposite Party No.3 under Annexure-5 on 08.10.2021, but the same is yet to be disposed of.
4.1. It is accordingly contended that Opposite Party No.3 be directed to dispose the appeal within the stipulated time period.
5. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State has no serious objection to the course of action proposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner.
6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opposite Party No.3 to dispose of the appeal so filed by the Petitioner under Annexure-5 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order, if the same has not yet been disposed of with due intimation to the Petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 20-Aug-2026 17:54:45 Signature Not Verified