Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25860/2026 of MADHABA BAGARTY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25860 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010614652026 Madhaba Bagarty …. Petitioner Mr. L. Sahu, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 19.08.2026 01. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25860 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010614652026
Madhaba Bagarty
….
Petitioner
Mr. L. Sahu, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit the Writ Application, issue notice to the Opp. Parties and issue rule Nisi in the nature of Writ of mandamus or any other Writ/Writs as deem fit and proper calling to the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the petitioner shall not be given promotion to the rank of Yardman and why his seniority in the said rank of yardman shall not be counted from his date of entitlement directed to the Opp. Party No.4 to considered the representation of the petitioner vide Annexure-4within a stipulated period.
// 2 //
And pass such other order (s)/ direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.
And for which act of kindness, the petitioner shallas in duty bound, ever pray.”.
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 20-Aug-2026 17:54:45 Signature Not Verified