Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25893/2026 of DR.SAMAR BALLAV DAS Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25893 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010614652026 Dr. Samar Ballav Das …. Petitioner Mr. S. Sekhar, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & Anr. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 19.08.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.25893 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010614652026

Dr. Samar Ballav Das

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. Sekhar, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa & Anr.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. S.P. Das, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

19.08.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to:

i)Admit the writ application.

ii) Call for the record.

iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/writs direction/directions directing the opposite parties more particularly opposite party no. 1 to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 20.02.2004 and extend all

// 2 //

consequential service and financial benefits as due and admissible in terms of the order dated 16.04.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Diary No.22600/2022 and batch (State of Odisha Versus Dr. Rajendra Kumar Dash and others) under Annexure:14 within reasonable time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court within a reasonable time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

iv) And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper for the ends of justice.

And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”.

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat

Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 20-Aug-2026 17:54:45 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead