Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25594/2026 of KAINTARA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY (PACS), KAINTARA, SUBARNAPUR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 25594 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010599672026 Kaintara Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society (PACS), Kaintara, Subarnapur ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 25594 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010599672026

Kaintara Primary Agricultural

Cooperative Society (PACS),

Kaintara, Subarnapur

.....

Petitioner

Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

19.08.2026 Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under these circumstances, it is just and necessary in the interest of Justice that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: a) direct O.P.No.6 (Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Sonepur) to consider the representation (Annexure-3) of the present petitioner within a period of seven days;

b) direct the Opposite Parties to show cause that why they are going to hand over the paddy procurement of a Gram Panchayat to a Women Self Help Group (WSHG) by suppressing the

Page 2 of 2. interest of a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society (PACS);

c) pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case to afford complete to the petitioner.”

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.6 vide Annexure-3 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.6 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-3 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge

Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 20-Aug-2026 15:16:17 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead