Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25741/2026 of RAJANI BAGHA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 25741 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010603522026 Rajani Bagha ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Swain, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 25741 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010603522026

Rajani Bagha

.....

Petitioner

Mr. S. Swain, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

19.08.2026 Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that your Lordship would be graciously pleased to admit the writ application, issue notice to the opp. parties to show cause as to why the writ application shall not be allowed and upon their showing no cause or insufficient cause, allow the writ application and issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ(s) quash the order vide No. 1302 dated 07/04/2026 Under Annexure-1 passed by the Opposite Party No.3 and directing the opposite parties specifically Opposite Party No. 2 & 3 to re-instate the petitioner in her service as Master Book Keeper of Paikasahi, Gram Panchayat Level Federation (GPLF) under Athamallik block, Angul with all service benefits and consequential benefits in the interest of justice. And pass any such other order(s) as may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

Page 2 of 2.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge

Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 20-Aug-2026 15:16:17 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead