Orissa High Court

WP(C)/40804/2023 of M/S GVV CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., BBSR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 40804 of 2023 ODHC011005542023 M/s. GVV Construction Pvt. Ltd. …. Petitioner Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Ms. Biswabara Dash, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 40804 of 2023

ODHC011005542023

M/s. GVV Construction Pvt. Ltd.

….

Petitioner

Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

….

Opposite Parties

Ms. Biswabara Dash, Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

19.08.2026

I.A. No.12730 of 2026 & W.P.(C) No.40804 of 2023

05.

1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for grant of the following prayer(s):

“It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to

I. Admit the writ application;

II. Issue Rule NISI calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the notice dtd.01.12.2023 under Annexure-7 and Tender Evaluation Committee Proceeding dtd.06.12.2023 under Annexure-8 shall not be quashed; being illegal, arbitrary and suffering from apparent non-application of mind;

III. Issue Rule NISI calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the technical disqualification of the petitioner shall not be quashed;

IV. Make the said Rule ABSOLUTE by issuing appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, if the Opp. Parties fail to show cause and/or show insufficient cause.

And may pass any other order/ orders, direction/ directions as this Hon’ble Court deems just, fit, equitable and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

2. The afore-noted Interlocutory Application is taken out by the applicant/petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the instant writ petition.

3. Perused the application.

4. Ms. Biswabara Dash, learned Additional Standing Counsel (ASC) appearing on behalf of the opposite parties-State submits that she has no objection, if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the averments made in the application and the consent from the State, the application for withdrawal of the instant writ petition is hereby allowed.

6. Accordingly, the I.A. and the writ petition stand disposed of. Interim order(s), if there be any, stands vacated.

(Harish Tandon)

Chief Justice

(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge

S. Behera Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 21-Aug-2026 12:05:08 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead