Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26146/2026 of PADMANAV JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 18 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26146 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010615162026 Padmanav Jena …. Petitioner Mr. T.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 18.08.2026 01. 1. This
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26146 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010615162026
Padmanav Jena
….
Petitioner
Mr. T.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and
Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. S. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “The petitioner therefore prays that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to direct the 0pp.Parties to consider the ease of the petitioner for allowing pension and pensionary benefits by counting his past service rendered under J.C. estt. and Regular Estt. in the light of the benefit given to similarly situated employees under the All-Orissa Settlement and Consolidation Non-Gazette Technical Officers Association, Dhenkanal vide Govt. order dated 04.08.2023; And pass such other orders /directions as may be deemed fit and proper.”
// 2 //
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV SWAIN Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 21-Aug-2026 16:10:34 Signature Not Verified