Orissa High Court
WP(C)/21989/2026 of NARENDRA MOHANTY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 18 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21989 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010496262026 Narendra Mohanty …. Petitioner Dr. J.K. Lenka, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21989 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010496262026
Narendra Mohanty
….
Petitioner
Dr. J.K. Lenka, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
1.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Opposite Parties to regularize the services of the petitioner in the post of Peon against the sanctioned post with effect from the date he completed 6 years of service and direct the Opp. Parties to grant the petitioner all consequential service and financial benefits, including fixation of pay by allowing notional increments from the date of his initial contractual appointment, continuity of service, seniority and all other service benefits as admissible under law; Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the
// 2 //
facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation vide Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition before Opposite Party No.1 and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of within a stipulated time period to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction on Opposite Party No.1 to consider and dispose of the representation vide Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition, in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Mili Digitally Signed Signed by: MILI MAHARANA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 16:24:25 Signature Not Verified