Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/9467/2026 of TIKINA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 18 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9467 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010500142026 1. Tikina Sahoo 2. Nityananda Sahoo 3. Bichitra Nanda Sahoo 4. Bhagirathi Sahoo …. Petitioners Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 9467 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010500142026
1. Tikina Sahoo
2. Nityananda Sahoo
3. Bichitra Nanda
Sahoo
4. Bhagirathi Sahoo
….
Petitioners
Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.945 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C. (Cog.), Khurda, arising out of Jankia P.S. Case No.448 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 115(2)/296/3(5)/351(2)/74 of BNS.
3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instruction, submits that in the meanwhile the Investigating Agency has resorted to
the provisions contained in Section 35(3) of the BNSS.
4. In view of the same, since there is no perceptible threat of arrest, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 18:40:54 Signature Not Verified