Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9426/2026 of SANTOSH ROUL Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9426 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010612812026 1. Santosh Roul 2. Nabin Roul 3. Bharat Roul 4. Umesh Thakur …. Petitioners Ms. P. Muduli, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 9426 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010612812026

1. Santosh Roul

2. Nabin Roul

3. Bharat Roul

4. Umesh Thakur

….

Petitioners

Ms. P. Muduli, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

18.08.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T(Spl.) Case No.54 of 2026 pending on the file of learned District & Sessions Judge, Bargarh, arising out of Bargarh Sadar P.S. Case No.252 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/ 296/ 115(2)/ 118(1)/ 117(2)/ 351(3)/ 3(5) of BNS r/w Sections 3(1)(r)/ 3(1)(s)/ 3(2)(va) of the SC & ST (PoA) Act, 1989.

3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

4. In the light of the order passed by this Court in the case of Pramod Kumar Ray and others

Vrs. State of Odisha, (2017) 67 OCR 309, this ABLAPL is disposed of with the following directions.

The Petitioners shall surrender before the learned Court in seisin in the aforesaid case within three weeks from today. Seven days before the surrender of the Petitioners before the said Court, the Petitioners or their counsel shall serve a copy of the bail application or such number of copies of the bail application on the learned Public Prosecutor/Special Public Prosecutor, as required by him, for the purpose of notice to the Victim and/or Informant.

5. Taking into consideration the nature of the offence as alleged against the Petitioners, it is directed that the Petitioners shall be released on interim bail by the learned Court in seisin, on the same day he surrenders in the aforesaid case, pending disposal of the bail application on merit, on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper including the following conditions:-

I) The Petitioners shall appear before the I.O. once in a week on the date and time fixed by the said I.O. until further order by the learned Court in seisin;

II) The Petitioners shall not threaten, induce or coerce any witnesses of this case or the Victim; and

III) The Petitioners shall not involve himself in similar or any other offence during currency of this order.

6. Within two weeks of appearance of the Victim and/or Informant, the matter shall be considered and disposed of on its own merits.

7. The ABLAPL accordingly stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Ayesha

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 19:08:09 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead