Orissa High Court
WP(C)/24768/2026 of KIRTIRANJAN SAHU Vs DCB BANK LTD., KANDHAMAL on 18 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 24768 OF 2026 CNR No. ODHC010581602026 Kirtiranjan Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. Sidhartha Mishra, Advocate -versus- DSB Bank Ltd., Kandhamal and another …. Opp. Parties Mr. Ramachandra Panigrahy, Advocate along with Mr. Bijay Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 24768 OF 2026
CNR No. ODHC010581602026
Kirtiranjan Sahu
….
Petitioner
Mr. Sidhartha Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
DSB Bank Ltd., Kandhamal and
another
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Ramachandra Panigrahy, Advocate
along with Mr. Bijay Kumar Sethi, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 18.08.2026
1.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:
“Under the aforesaid facts and circumstance, it is most respectfully prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule NISI, calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the Petitioner shall not be allowed to settle his loan account within a period of eight months and as to why the Opposite Party No.1 shall not be restrained from taking any coercive action over the mortgaged property, and if the Opposite Party fails to show cause or show insufficient cause, the Rule be made absolute; and May further be pleased to pass any other Writ (s)/ order(s)/direction(s) as would be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice;. AND FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER, AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.”
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 10:33:25 Signature Not Verified
3. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.
4. Mr. Sethi, learned counsel appearing along with Mr. Panigrahy, learned counsel, files Vakalatnama on behalf of Opposite Party No.1-Bank in Court, which is taken on record. He, however, submits that in the meantime, an order under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, has already been passed.
5. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the Petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) ms
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 10:33:25 Signature Not Verified