Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25965/2026 of TEJRAJ PATEL Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 18 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 25965 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010608842026 Tejraj Patel ..... Petitioner Mr. M. Pati, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 25965 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010608842026
Tejraj Patel
.....
Petitioner
Mr. M. Pati, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore prays that your lordships may graciously be pleased to allow this writ application by directing the Opp. parties to modify the order dtd. 29.04.2025 under Annexure-8 thereby declaring the same as illegal and erroneous one and further directing the Opp. Party No.3 & 4 for proper fixation of pay & pension of the petitioner on the basis of G.P of Rs.5400/- in the corresponding scale of pay as per the pay matrix available under 1st schedule of ORSP Rules 2017 w.e.f 01.01.2016 and further sanctioning & disbursing the consequential arrear financial benefits as due & admissible in favour of the petitioner within a time bound period for the interest of justice.
Page 2 of 2. And pass such order/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-10 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 3, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 3 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 3 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 16:45:31 Signature Not Verified