Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/7685/2026 of ABINASH SENDHA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 18 August 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 7685 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010460872026 1. Abinash Sendha 2. Tilotamma Sendha 3. Kumari Abhilipsa Sendha 4. Sasmita Ghadei 5. Khirod Ghadei 6. Kumari Sriya Sucharita Ghadei …. Petitioners Mr. G.P. Jena, Advocate -versus- 1. State of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 7685 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010460872026
1. Abinash Sendha
2. Tilotamma Sendha
3. Kumari Abhilipsa
Sendha
4. Sasmita Ghadei
5. Khirod Ghadei
6. Kumari Sriya
Sucharita Ghadei
….
Petitioners
Mr. G.P. Jena, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha
2. Informant
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA
Mr. S. N. Gaya, Adv. (Informant)
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Khaira (Balasore) P.S. Case No.147 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Khaira, for commission of offences punishable under Section
115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/296/3(5)/303(2)/351(2)/76 of BNS.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that because of the counter FIR, exaggerated allegations have been made. Hence, the Petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail.
4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned counsel for the Informant opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail, inter alia, referring to the manner in which the assault has been made and also refers to the statement of informant, the wife of the injured.
6. This Court perused the injury report of the said Nabakishore Samantaray, the husband of the Informant. It is seen that injured has suffered bruise on the face and on eye, which has been categorized as simple.
7. Considering the background in which the allegation has been levelled, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature.
8. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioners have any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.
9. Additionally, it is directed that Petitioner No.1 shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once every week on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin till submission of final form. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the Court in seisin.
10. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
11. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
12. U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Aug-2026 18:40:55 Signature Not Verified