Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/7992/2026 of MADHURIMA MISHRA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7992 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010505922026 Madhurima Mishra …. Petitioner Mr.K. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr.A.K. Pati, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 17.08.2026 02. 1. Heard learned

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.7992 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010505922026

Madhurima Mishra

….

Petitioner

Mr.K. Mohanty, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr.A.K. Pati, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

17.08.2026

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.946 of 2019, arising out Jatni P.S. Case No.319 of 2019 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Jatni for commission of offences punishable under Section 294/323/419/420/ 465/468/471/34 of the IPC read with section 66(C)/66(D) of the Information I.T. Act.

3. The allegation of the prosecution pertains to an online investment scheme operating under the name & style of JMMBTC World through the website jmmbtcworld.com. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that since in the meanwhile charge sheet has already been submitted and the Petitioner does not have any criminal proclivity, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that the Petitioner was actively involved and since the charge sheet has been filed showing him as absconder, no leniency ought to be shown.

5. On the specific query of this Court, counsel for the State, on instruction, submits that there is no money trail to the account of the Petitioner.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just of the and proper subject to verification of antecedents.

7. If it comes to fore that the Petitioner has criminal antecedents of similar nature, this order shall not be given effect to.

8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

9. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Basu Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Designation: Addl. Dy. Registrar-cum-Addl. Principal Secy. Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 18-Aug-2026 18:29:11 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead