Orissa High Court
WP(C)/1962/2026 of M/S.VISION INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH, CUTTACK Vs UNION OF INDIA on 17 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1962 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010014592026 M/s. Vision Institute of Medical Science and Research, Cuttack …. Petitioner Mr. Subhankar Rout, Advocate -versus- Union of India and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Deepak Cochhayat, Central
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.1962 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010014592026
M/s. Vision Institute of Medical
Science and Research, Cuttack
….
Petitioner
Mr. Subhankar Rout, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and Others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Deepak Cochhayat,
Central Government Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE MR. K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MR. MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 17.08.2026
04.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The writ application has been filed for the following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue notice to the Opp. Parties particularly Opp. Party No.2 and 3 to show cause as to why; The application form, i.e.. Standard Inspection Form under Annexure-2 Series, should not be considered and issue approval for the academic session 2025-26 in D. Pharm. Course of 60 seats;
And in the event, the Opp. Parties particularly Opp. Party No.2 failed to show cause or show an insufficient case, direct to renew the approval for the academic session 2025-26 of D. Pharm Courses for 60 seats; And further be pleased to direct Opp. Parties particularly Opp. Parties No,2 and 3 to allow admission of students as per the guidelines formulated by Opp. Party No.2
And may pass any other order (s), direction(s), relief(s) as deem fit and proper; And for such an act of kindness, the Petitioner shall, as in duty bound, ever pray”.
3. Mr. Rout, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the inaction of the Opposite Parties in not recommending for grant of No Objection Certificate (NOC) in respect of the Petitioner- Institution for the academic session 2025-26 is under challenge in this writ application. In view of the fact that the academic session is over, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Mr. Gochhayat, learned Central Government Counsel also agrees to such submission.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Himansu Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 18-Aug-2026 13:22:40 Signature Not Verified