Orissa High Court
WP(C)/23018/2026 of DILLIP KUMAR @ DILIP KUMAR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 17 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 23018 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010512342026 Dillip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Barik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 23018 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010512342026
Dillip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar
.....
Petitioner
Mr. B. Barik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the circumstances, it is humbly prayed to this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue notice to the Opp. parties as to why the case shall not be allowed and after hearing parties may kindly be directed to the opp. parties to regularize the service of the petitioner from his initial appointment i.e 01.05.1992 with other consequential financial benefits in terms of Govt. order issued from time to time and law settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as he is working as DLR basis and temporary status more than 34 years of service under opp. parties in stipulated time for the interest of justice.
And further to direct the opp. parties to regularize the service of the petitioner in view of the judgments of the Apex Court of India in case of Umadevi and M.L Keshari (Supra), as well as Amarkanti Rai & Civil Diary No- 22012 of 2024 on dtd. 06.09.2024, in the case of Jaggo
Page 2 of 2. Vrs. Union of India& Others. and Case of Prasanna Kumar Barik.
And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as your Lordships deem fit and proper for the ends of justice; And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray;”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 18-Aug-2026 18:35:44 Signature Not Verified