Orissa High Court
CRLMC/2767/2026 of SUDIPTA@SUDIPTA RANJAN CHAND Vs JITENDRA MINZ on 17 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.2767 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010598532026 Sudipta@ Sudipta Ranjan Chand ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Soumya Ranjan Das -versus- Jitendra Minz ..... Opp. Party Represented by Adv. - CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2767 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010598532026
Sudipta@ Sudipta Ranjan
Chand
.....
Petitioner
Represented by Adv.
- Soumya Ranjan Das
-versus-
Jitendra Minz
.....
Opp. Party
Represented by Adv. -
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Consolidated copy of the cause title, which is filed, is taken on record.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Perused the materials placed before this Court.
4. It is stated by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in a proceeding under Section 138 of the NI Act. He further contended that pursuant to the summons, the Petitioner appeared before the learned trial court and moved an application under Section 205 of the Cr.P.C. Thereafter, the personal appearance of the Petitioner was dispensed with. He further contended that due to a communication gap, the Petitioner could not appear before the learned trial court despite
Page 2 of 2. direction of the learned trial court. As a result, the learned trial court has issued an NBW on 12.06.2025 against the present Petitioner. In reply to the aforesaid order issuing NBW against the present Petitioner, learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that due to a communication gap with the conducting counsel, the Petitioner could not appear and that the Petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the learned trial court and cooperate with early conclusion of the trial.
5. On perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the trial court has not committed any illegality, however, in the larger interests of justice and in order to provide another opportunity to the Petitioner, this Court deems it proper to set aside the order dated 12.06.2025 by the learned J.M.F.C., Rourkela in 1.C.C. Case No.386 of 2016, subject to payment of a cost of Rs.1,200/- (Rupees One Thousand Two Hundred) by the Petitioner to the complainant. Further, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the learned J.M.F.C., Rourkela within two weeks from today along with a copy of today’s order and shall continue to participate in the proceeding without any further default. In the event, the Petitioner makes any further default in appearance, it is open to the Court in seisin over the matter to take necessary coercive steps against the Petitioner.
6. In such view of the matter, the CRLMC is allowed.
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Anil
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANIL KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 18-Aug-2026 19:35:40 Signature Not Verified