Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25787/2026 of BASANTI SAHOO Vs TATA POWER CENTRAL ODISHA DISTRIBUTION LTD, BHUBANESWAR on 17 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25787 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010603922026 Basanti Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. S. Dash, Advocate -versus- Tata Power Central Odisha Distribution Ltd., Bhubaneswar & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25787 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010603922026
Basanti Sahoo
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Tata Power Central
Odisha Distribution Ltd.,
Bhubaneswar & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to I. Admit this Writ Petition. II. Issue notice and call for the relevant document III. Issue appropriate writ / writs, order / orders and direction / directions to quash the provisional assessment notice issued by OP No.4 dated 20.07.2026 where the demand amount is Rs.9,600 under Annexure-
3. // 2 //
IV. And further be directed OP No.2 & 3 not to disconnect the Electric Connection of the Petitioner.
And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. It is contended that challenging the demand notice issue under Annexure-3 in the nature of provisional assessment, Petitioner though filed his reply / objection on 28.07.2026 under Annexure-4, but prior to taking a final decision on the issue, the authorities are in the process to disconnect the power supply to the Petitioner’s premises.
4.1. It is accordingly contended that Opposite Parties be restrained from disconnecting the power supply, till a decision is taken on the demand, with due consideration of the reply so filed by the Petitioner under Annexure-4.
5. Mr. L.K. Maharana, learned counsel appearing for the TPCODL fairly contended that the final assessment order will be passed with due consideration of the reply made by the Petitioner under Annexure-4, if the same has not yet been passed.
6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opposite Party No.2 to consider the reply filed by the Petitioner under Annexure-4, prior to issuance of the final
// 3 //
assessment order, if not passed in the meantime. Till a decision is taken with due consideration of the reply, no coercive action be taken against the Petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 20-Aug-2026 17:50:44 Signature Not Verified