Orissa High Court
WP(C)/20014/2024 of ASHOK KUMAR NAIK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 17 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 20014 of 2024 CNR No. ODHC010595172024 Ashok Kumar Naik ..... Petitioner Mr. N. Biswal, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 20014 of 2024
CNR No. ODHC010595172024
Ashok Kumar Naik
.....
Petitioner
Mr. N. Biswal, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.08.2026 Order No. 02
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Even though the present writ petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd.11.07.2024 so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 under Annexure-15, but in course of hearing learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that Petitioner be given liberty to make a fresh application for reconsideration of the Petitioner’s claim in terms of the G.A. & P.G. Department circular dtd.06.03.2020 so available under Annexure-8.
4. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate has no serious objection to the course of action proposed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submission made, this Court while disposing the writ petition, permits the Petitioner to move a fresh application for reconsideration of his claim so disposed of vide the impugned order.
Page 2 of 2.
5.1. It is observed that, if any such application is moved before Opp. Party No. 1 within a period of three (3) weeks hence, the said Opp. Party shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a further period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such application with due communication to the Petitioner.
6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 18-Aug-2026 18:38:37 Signature Not Verified