Orissa High Court
CONTC/4558/2026 of RAJASHREE SAHOO Vs J SONAL,(IAS),COLLECTOR CUM EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE,JAGATSINGHPUR on 14 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.4558 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010524312026 Rajashree Sahoo ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. – Mr. Asish Kumar Ray -versus- J. Sonal, IAS, Collector-cum-Executive Magistrate, Jagatsinghpur ..... Opposite Party/ Contemnor Represented by Adv.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.4558 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010524312026
Rajashree Sahoo
.....
Petitioner
Represented by Adv. –
Mr. Asish Kumar Ray
-versus-
J. Sonal, IAS,
Collector-cum-Executive
Magistrate, Jagatsinghpur
.....
Opposite Party/
Contemnor
Represented by Adv. –
Mr. U.R. Jena, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.08.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the Opposite Party-Contemnor.
3. W.P.(C) No.8502 of 2026 was disposed of vide order dated 23.03.2026 thereby directing the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Jagatsinghpur to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 09.02.2026 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, at this juncture, contended that by virtue of order dated 14.05.2026 at
Page 2 of 2.
Annexure-4, the Opposite Party-Contemnor has rejected the representation of the Petitioner without considering the same in the light of the judgment referred to by this Court in its order dated 23.03.2026.
5. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party-Contemnor, on the other hand, contended that the representation of the Petitioner has been disposed of in terms of the order dated 23.03.2026.
6. On a careful scrutiny of the order dated 14.05.2026 at Annexure-4, this Court found that the representation of the Petitioner has already been rejected.
7. Accordingly, while disposing of the contempt application, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to challenge the order dated 14.05.2026 at Annexure-4 by filing a fresh writ petition in the event the Petitioner, if so advised.
( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra)
Judge Debasis
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 17-Aug-2026 20:20:17 Signature Not Verified