Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25341/2026 of ABHIRAM MAHANTA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 14 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25341 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010597322026 Abhiram Mahanta …. Petitioner Mr. S. Roy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 14.08.2026 01. 1. This
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25341 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010597322026
Abhiram Mahanta
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. Roy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and
Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and issue Rule "NISI" to the Opp. Parties to show cause as to;
(i) Why the action of the Opposite Parties in not regularizing the services of the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case will not be declared as illegal; and
(ii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner within a stipulated time; and
(iii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to sanction pension and other pensionary
// 2 //
benefits as due and admissible under the OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 in favour of the petitioner on such regularization of his service within a stipulated time; And if the Opp. Parties do not show cause then the Rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ/writs and any other order as deem fit be passed.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-8 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV SWAIN Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 17-Aug-2026 10:51:59 Signature Not Verified