Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/9310/2026 of KARTIK PARIDA @ KARTIKA PARIDA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 14 August 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9310 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010591142026 1. Kartik Parida @ Kartika Parida 2. Surendra Parida @ Suria Parida 3. Bira Parida 4. Mayadhar Parida @ Ranjit Parida 5. Ashok Kumar Swain @ Aloka 6. Aparti Swain 7. Dipak Ku. Singh @ Dipaka Kumar Singh @
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 9310 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010591142026
1. Kartik Parida @
Kartika Parida
2. Surendra Parida
@ Suria Parida
3. Bira Parida
4. Mayadhar Parida
@ Ranjit Parida
5. Ashok Kumar
Swain @ Aloka
6. Aparti Swain
7. Dipak Ku. Singh @
Dipaka Kumar
Singh @ Babula
Singh
….
Petitioners
Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. A.K. Pati, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.08.2026
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.1024 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., (Cog.) Khurda arising out of Bolagarh P.S. Case No.339 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 109/115(2)/296/3(5)/351(2) of BNS.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that exaggerated allegations have been made just to implicate the Petitioners under Section 109 BNS and since the injuries are simple, Petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail.
4. It is further submitted that the Petitioner No.1 has one criminal antecedent and Petitioner No.7 has two criminal antecedents and the rest of the Petitioners i.e. Petitioner Nos.2 to 6 have no criminal proclivity.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during currency of investigation.
6. Taking into account the nature of allegation, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedents as per the recitals noted herein above.
7. If it comes to the fore that the submission regarding the antecedents found to be incorrect, this order shall not be given effect to.
8. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
10. U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 14-Aug-2026 18:51:53 Signature Not Verified