Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9333/2026 of SK. MUKIMUDDIN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9333 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010604892026 Sk. Mukimuddin …. Petitioner Mr. P. C. Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. U. C. Jena, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 13.08.2026 01. 1. Heard learned

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9333 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010604892026

Sk. Mukimuddin

….

Petitioner

Mr. P. C. Jena, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. U. C. Jena, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.08.2026

01.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.442 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Jaleswar, arising out of Jaleswar P.S. Case No.361 of 2026, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 297/318(4)/3(5) of BNS.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the allegation has been made against the Petitioner only because he is the house owner and it is submitted that the co-accused with graver complicity have been released on pre-arrest bail by this Court by order dated 14.07.2026 in ABLAPL No.7646 of 2026 and by order dated 22.07.2026 in ABLAPL No.7989 of 2026 and hence, on the ground of parity the Petitioner may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

5. Considering the nature of allegation and release of the accused, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of not more than one criminal antecedent of similar nature.

6. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has more than one criminal antecedent of similar nature, this order shall not be given effect to.

7. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

8. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 13-Aug-2026 19:27:26 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead