Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9017/2026 of SUBHASHREE SINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 13 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9017 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010564152026 Subhashree Singh …. Petitioner Mr. S. R. Rao, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Informant/Victim …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9017 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010564152026

Subhashree Singh

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. R. Rao, Advocate

-versus-

1. State of Odisha

2. Informant/Victim

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.08.2026

01.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.444 of corresponding to I.C.C. Case No. 64 of 2025 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Khordha arising out of Baghamari P.S. Case No.112 of 2024 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 294/ 292(2)(a)/ 469/ 506/ 34 of IPC R/w Sections 66E/67/67(a) of I.T. Act, 2000.

3. The Petitioner being apprehensive of arrest on receipt of notice at the pre-cognizance stage issued by the learned Magistrate on the basis of protest petition being filed by the informant, has approached this Court.

4. In view of the latest judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Om Prakash Chhawnika alias Om Prakash Chabnika alias Om Prakash Chawnika v. State of Jharkhand and Another 2026 SCC Online SC 676, this Court is of the considered view that such apprehension is thoroughly misconceived.

5. In view of the same, since there is no imminent threat of arrest, the ABLAPL accordingly stands disposed of.

6. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to renew his prayer if there is any fresh cause of action.

7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 13-Aug-2026 19:27:25 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead