Orissa High Court
WP(C)/7648/2020 of HARASHREE MAHAMANSINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 13 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.7648 of 2020 CNR No.ODHC010162882020 Harashree Mahamansingh …. Petitioner Mr. A.K. Srichandan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Dash, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.7648 of 2020
CNR No.ODHC010162882020
Harashree
Mahamansingh
….
Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Srichandan,
Advocate on behalf of
Mr. S.K. Dash, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha and
Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No
ORDER
13.08.2026
12. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi in the nature of writ of mandamus and ‘or’ any other writ, writs, direction, directions and. order, orders calling upon the Opp. partis as to why they. shall not be commanded _to regularise the service of the petitioner with effect from her date of initial ‘appointment on temporary ad hoc basic, in considering of the representation vide Annexure-10,11 with all consequential service benefits, within a particular time.
// 2 //
And_ if the Opp. parties fail to show cause insufficient false cause, made the said Rule Nisi absolute. And to issue any other writ or writs, direction or directions, order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper.”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three(3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid time period.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV SWAIN Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 17-Aug-2026 14:36:08 Signature Not Verified