Orissa High Court
WP(C)/24679/2026 of SITAKANTA NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 13 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 24679 of 2026 CNR No.- ODHC010562772026 Sitakanta Nayak …. Petitioner Ms. J.R. Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Bibekananda Nayak, AGA CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P(C) No. 24679 of 2026
CNR No.- ODHC010562772026
Sitakanta Nayak
….
Petitioner
Ms. J.R. Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Bibekananda Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
02. 13.08.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. The Mukhya Mantri Sahari Bikash Yojana resolution filed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner is taken on record.
2. Ms. J. R. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has filed a representation and his grievance will be met, if a direction is issued to the District Collector to dispose of the representation (Annexure-1) which has been submitted on 13.06.2026.
3. Perusal of Annexure-1 reveals that it is addressed to
1. The District Collector, Cuttack, 2.The Commissioner, Cuttack Municipal Corporation, Cuttack, 3. The Tahasildar,
Salipur, District Cuttack, 4. The Secretary, Department of Water Resources (Irrigation), Government of Odisha. The subject has been mentioned as- grievance regarding proposed road construction under Mukhya Mantri Sahari Bikash Yojana (MSBY) Scheme in Ward No.49, Jagtpur - Request for construction of a proper drainage system before execution of the proposed paver block road from Sai Residency Phase-II to Imamnagar Chasa Sahi.
4. There is no endorsement or any document to indicate that this representation has been served on/received by the District Collector, Cuttack.
5. Considering the submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Application is disposed of without going into the merits of the case of the Petitioner, but permitting the Petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the District Collector, Cuttack within a period of two weeks, with a further direction to the District Collector, Cuttack to consider the same and dispose it in accordance with law expeditiously.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sipra Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPRA MUDULI Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 13-Aug-2026 17:18:38 Signature Not Verified