Orissa High Court
WP(C)/24021/2026 of M/S.P.K.CONSTRUCTION, CUTTACK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 12 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.24021 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010575642026 M/s. P.K. Construction, Cuttack …. Petitioner Represented by Adv.– Mr. Lalatendu Samantaray, Senior Advocate Ms. Shreya Patnaik, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha and others ….
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24021 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010575642026
M/s. P.K. Construction, Cuttack
….
Petitioner
Represented by Adv.–
Mr. Lalatendu Samantaray, Senior Advocate Ms. Shreya Patnaik, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opposite Parties
Represented by Adv.–
Ms. Aishwarya Dash, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON’ BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12.08.2026
01.
1. The petitioner filed the instant writ petition challenging the recommendation for blacklisting and blocking of the portal allegedly on the ground of having uploaded the forged lease agreement.
2. It is averred in the instant writ petition that the exercise for debarment and/or blocking of the portal is not legally sustainable unless an opportunity of defense and/or hearing is afforded to the petitioner.
3. Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State- opposite parties submits, on instruction, that the allegation made in the instant writ petition is unfounded for the reason that the petitioner has been awarded a contract in relation to the same tender and, therefore, there is no subsisting cause of action in the instant matter. A copy of the letter dated 12.08.2026 issued by the Chief Construction Engineer,
Rural Works Circle, Angul to the office of the Advocate General is handed over to the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner in course of hearing.
4. In view of the said fact, the instant writ petition has become infructuous and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
S.K. Jena/Sr. Secy. Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: Asst. Registrar-cum-Sr. Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 13-Aug-2026 14:16:15 Signature Not Verified