Orissa High Court

CMP/1531/2016 of KAILASH CHANDRA BHOI Vs TEJA SETH on 3 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1531 of 2016 Kailash Chandra Bhoi …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Acharya, Advoate -versus- 1. Teja Seth 2. Manbodh Sahu 3. Banbas Sahu 4. Brundaban Sahu …. Opp. Parties CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No. 1531 of 2016

Kailash Chandra Bhoi

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Acharya, Advoate

-versus-

1. Teja Seth

2. Manbodh Sahu

3. Banbas Sahu

4. Brundaban Sahu

….

Opp. Parties

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 03.08.2026

(Through Hybrid Mode)

06.

1. This CMP has been filed with the following prayer:-

“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit this petition and issue Rule Nisi calling upon the opp. parties to show cause as to why the order dated 20.09.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bargarh in C. S. No. 134 of 2014 under Annexure-5 shall not be quashed.

And if the opp. parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, make the said Rule absolute and issue writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/writs quashing the impugned order under Annexure-5;

And issue such other direction/s and pass such other order/s as may be deemed fit and proper;

And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

2. While issuing notice on 06.10.2016, this Court had stayed further proceeding in the civil suit.

3. Mr. S.K. Acharya, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meanwhile the suit has been disposed of on 21.12.2021, for which the CMP has been rendered infructuous. He files a memo to that effect. The same is taken on record.

4. In view of the submission of the learned counsel and the memo filed, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed.

5. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated and pending interim application stands disposed of.

6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Aug-2026 20:32:26 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead