Orissa High Court
CMP/1617/2016 of RABINDRA ALIAS RATHINDRA CH.MARDARAJ HARICHANDAN Vs SAKUNTALA DAS ALIAS MOHANTY on 3 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1617 of 2016 Rathindra @ Rathindra Chandra Mardaraj Harichandan & Others …. Petitioners Mr. G.R. Sahoo, Advoate on behalf of Mr. M.R. Baug, Advocate -versus- Smt. Sakuntala Das @ Mohanty & Others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: THE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 1617 of 2016
Rathindra
@
Rathindra
Chandra
Mardaraj Harichandan & Others
….
Petitioners
Mr. G.R. Sahoo, Advoate
on behalf of Mr. M.R. Baug, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. Sakuntala Das @ Mohanty &
Others
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 03.08.2026
(Through Hybrid Mode)
07.
1. This CMP has been filed with the following prayer:-
“Under the facts and circumstances stated above, this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit this Civil Miscellaneous petition and issued a ‘Rule-Nisi’ calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the impugned appellate judgment vide Annexure-3 shall not be quashed and thereafter as to why the order of the learned trial court vide Annexure-2 shall not be restored and if the Opposite parties fail to show-cause or show insufficient cause make the said rule absolute.
And
Pass such other order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper.
And for this act of your kindness, the petitioners shall ever pray.”
2. Notice in this application had been issued on 02.11.2016, but no interim order had been passed.
3. Mr. G.R. Sahoo, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that in the meanwhile the suit has been disposed of, for which the CMP has become infructuous. He files a memo signed by Mr. M.R. Baug, learned counsel for the Petitioner, to that effect. The same is taken on record.
4. In view of the submission of the learned counsel and the memo filed, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed.
5. Misc. Case No. 1700 of 2016 stands disposed of.
6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Aug-2026 20:32:26 Signature Not Verified