Orissa High Court

CMP/272/2016 of SANDHYARANI DAS Vs NARAYAN CHANDRA NAYAK on 31 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.272 of 2016 Sandhyarani Das …. Petitioner Mr. Rahul Kumar Jee, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Biswajit Moharana, Advocate -versus- Narayan Chandra Nayak and others …. Opposite Parties None CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No.272 of 2016

Sandhyarani Das

….

Petitioner

Mr. Rahul Kumar Jee, Advocate,

on behalf of Mr. Biswajit Moharana, Advocate

-versus-

Narayan Chandra Nayak and

others

….

Opposite Parties

None

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

31.07.2026

06. (Through Hybrid Mode)

1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 19.01.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar in C.S. no.1584 of 2009 (Annexure-6).

2. Vide order dated 19.01.2016, the learned trial Court has deputed the survey knowing commissioner to comply the order of the learned District Judge passed in FAO No.104 of 2010 and conduct demarcation of the land purchased by the parties under respective sale deeds, afresh.

3. On 22.07.2026, report had been called for from the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar regarding status of C.S. No.1584 of 2009.

4. Report dated 27.07.2026 of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Bhubaneswar has been received where it is stated that after 01.11.2023, the suit was lingering for disposal on account of the petitions filed by the plaintiff and defendants and thereafter the suit was posted for evidence from the side of plaintiff. From 29.11.2023 to 12.03.2025 the plaintiff did not take any step for examination of any witness and on 13.05.2025 the suit was dismissed for default.

5. As the suit is no longer pending, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the CMP pending.

6. Hence, the CMP stands dismissed.

7. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Misc. Case No.268 of 2016 stands disposed of.

8. Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court by the Registry.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge RKS Digitally Signed Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 31-Jul-2026 19:11:36 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead