Orissa High Court
WP(C)/23871/2026 of RADHA MOHAN Vs MINISTRY OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, NEW DELHI on 31 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) NO.23871 OF 2026 Radha Mohan …. Petitioner Mr. Sibadutta Ramaprasad Mishra, Advocate -versus- Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, New Delhi and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI with Ms. Sephalee Das,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) NO.23871 OF 2026
Radha Mohan
….
Petitioner
Mr. Sibadutta Ramaprasad Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises, New Delhi and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI
with Ms. Sephalee Das, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 31.07.2026
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. The petitioner in this writ petition prays for the following reliefs:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) and directing the Opp. Party-Bank of restructure of the loan accounts vide Loan A/c No.0553008700004318 & 0553008700004196 respectively under Annexure-5 and accept Rs.1,60,00,000/- from the present Petitioner towards the e-auction price within the stipulated period.
And further show cause as to why the loan accounts of the present Petitioner Firm should not be restructured and governed as per the MSME guidelines.
And if the Opp.Party-Bank fail to show cause insufficient cause the said rule be made absolute by granting following relief(s) by way of Writ of Mandamus or nay other appropriate Writ by
1. quashing the e-auction notice as well as the acceptance of the bid amount 25% from the Opp. Party No.7 on dtd.17.07.2026 and not to issue sale certificate in favour of the Opp. Party No.7.
2. Directing the Opp. Parties-Bank No.4 to 6 to restructure the present Petitioner’s account in term of MSME Scheme & guidelines under Annexure-3 & 4.”
3. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that ventilating the grievance made in the writ petition, the Petitioner has already approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Odisha, Kataka in S.A. No.109 of 2025 and S.A. No.118 of 2025. He therefore prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to pursue the remedy before the DRT, Odisha, Kataka.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the Petitioner, if so advised may pursue the matter before the DRT, Odisha, Kataka.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Radha/Jyostna Digitally Signed Signed by: RADHARANI JENA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 31-Jul-2026 18:35:44 Signature Not Verified