Orissa High Court

CMP/947/2016 of MANISA PARIDA Vs PURNACHANDRA DAS on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.947 of 2016 Manisa Parida and another …. Petitioners None -versus- Purnachandra Das and 14 others …. Opposite Parties None CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 30.07.2026 05. (Through Hybrid Mode) 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No.947 of 2016

Manisa Parida and another

….

Petitioners

None

-versus-

Purnachandra Das and 14 others

….

Opposite Parties

None

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

30.07.2026

05. (Through Hybrid Mode)

1. This CMP has been filed challenging the common order dated 11.04.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhadrak in Civil Suit No.46 of 2000-I, rejecting the petitions dated 10.02.2016 and 05.04.2016 filed by the plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC for amendment of the plaint.

2. While issuing notice on 15.07.2016, this Court has stayed further proceeding in Civil Suit No.46 of 2000-I, pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhadrak.

3. Registry has pointed out that notice has been served on Opposite Parties No.1 to 13 and neither A.D. nor unserved notice is back from Opposite Parties No.14 and 15.

4. On 28.07.2026 none had appeared for the parties but for the interest of justice the matter was directed to be listed today.

5. None appears for the Petitioner when the matter was called today in the first hour.

6. The matter is passed over as learned counsel for the Petitioner had appeared in another case which had been listed today. LATER

7. None appears for the Petitioner when the matter is called.

8. Hence, the CMP is dismissed for non-prosecution.

9. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Pending interim application stands disposed of.

10. This order be communicated to the learned trial Court by the Registry.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge RKS Digitally Signed Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 31-Jul-2026 17:14:36 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead