Orissa High Court

CMP/1166/2016 of AKSHAYA KUMAR BEHERA Vs NARAYAN BEHERA on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1166 of 2016 Akshaya Kumar Behera …. Petitioner None -versus- 1. Narayan Behera 2. Trilochan Behera 3. Umesh Kumar Behera 4. Amaresh Kumar Behera 5. Bayani Behera 6. Ajaya Behera 7. Binod Behera 8. Bijoy Behera 9. Bikram Behera 10. Chandan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No.1166 of 2016

Akshaya Kumar Behera

….

Petitioner

None

-versus-

1. Narayan Behera

2. Trilochan Behera

3. Umesh Kumar Behera

4. Amaresh Kumar Behera

5. Bayani Behera

6. Ajaya Behera

7. Binod Behera

8. Bijoy Behera

9. Bikram Behera

10. Chandan Behera

11. Jitan Behera

12. Ranjan Behera

13. Rukmani Behera

14. Ramani Behera

….

Opp. Parties

None

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

05. 30.07.2026

(Through hybrid Mode)

1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 08.07.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court Cuttack, rejecting the petition filed by Defendant No.14 for stay of the proceeding or to exclude the properties depicted in the petition from the purview of partition in the suit schedule properties, as because Test Case No.4 of 2016 was pending in respect of some of the properties.

2. This CMP has been filed on 05.08.2016 but has been adjourned on 17.08.2016, 31.08.2016 and 20.03.2017. When the matter was listed on the last date, none appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.

3. Neither notice of admission has been issued in the case nor has any interim order in this CMP been passed.

4. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that in the meanwhile, the Civil Suit No. 619 of 2013 must have been disposed of.

5. Hence, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed.

6. All pending interim application(s) stand disposed of.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

RKS Digitally Signed Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 30-Jul-2026 20:05:19 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead